一种基于方位时延的水下被动目标运动分析算法研究

设计了一种新型的水下被动目标运动分析系统.以测得的方位序列和到达不同传感器的时间差为基础,建立了状态方程和观测方程,运用扩展卡尔曼滤波算法,对系统进行了分析.通过蒙特卡罗模拟仿真实验结果表明,此算法具有收敛速度快、精度高、稳定性好等优点,有着良好的实际应用前景.     

相继增压柴油机推进装置增压系统特性研究

针对船舶推进装置中柴油主机相继增压特性的优化问题,在理论分析的基础上,建立了基于准稳态假设的增压系统能量平衡模型.对相继增压系统的稳、动态特性进行了分析,讨论了相继增压系统的特性优化问题,为主机采用相继增压技术的柴油机推进装置的性能优化、控制策略的制订提供了理论依据.     

武器系统采购费与维修费权衡的依据分析

根据武器系统寿命周期费用的理论和方法,建立了系统的费用模型,依据数学分析和优化理论,在已知可用武器系统目标数的前提下,建立了费用优化条件,确定了采购费与维修费的比例限值,用以确定武器系统采购费和维修费的最优比例,从而对系统方案确定的权衡分析提供量化依据.     

预冷却引射系统性能一维分析

根据引射器的一维设计理论可知,二次流在进入混合室之前进行预冷降温可以提高引射效率,增大引射系数,但引入预冷器会同时引起流动损失,故需要对引射系统进行性能评估。针对设有预冷器的引射系统,应用一维理论分析预冷对系统性能的影响,重点分析预冷增强效果与流阻减弱效果对引射效率的作用。研究发现:预冷器对引射系统同时带来冷却增强作用和流阻减弱作用,横截面积和换热面积是主要影响因素。预冷器存在临界横截面积,横截面积大于临界值时,换热面积越大,引射性能越高;反之,换热面积越大,引射性能越低。等压混合引射方案比等截面混合引射方案性能高,前者引射系数比后者大60%;预冷却能够有效提高引射性能,尤其是等截面混合引射方案,性能提高可达35.5%。     

要地防空敌袭主攻方向判断方法研究

主要对要地防空时多个可能的敌空袭兵器来袭方向进行了分析,并确定每个来袭方向的综合评价指标。应用模糊层次分析法建立多层次的评价指标体系,确立被评事物对各等级模糊子集的隶属度。应用灰色关联理论消除各个因素之间的量纲和数量级差异,将综合运算得到的量值进行排序比较,以供指挥员进行战场情况判断。     

舰载武器作战使用条件仿真量化分析

运用层次分析法、本征向量法和多属性决策问题的数据处理等方法,对舰载武器作战使用的约束条件进行了量化分析和数据处理,系统地描述了单一约束条件和多个约束条件对武器有效使用的概率问题,建立了约束条件下,舰载武器作战使用仿真流程。研究结果对舰载武器作战使用具有一定的指导作用。     

便携式逻辑分析仪硬件平台设计

针对现有逻辑分析仪制造成本高、不便携带以及应用场合受限的问题,设计了一种基于FPGA+STM32的便携式逻辑分析平台。该平台硬件成本低、易携带等指标满足大多数测试要求。其设计核心主要包括主控芯片、被测信号采样、触发控制、数据锁存、高速存储、串口通信、TFT液晶显示等电路,其功能实现主要依靠FPGA的硬件设计和STM32的软件控制。该平台最大可实现32通道、存储深度64 K、分析速率400 MSa/s的测试要求。通过该平台可以实现被测信号的采集、缓存、分析、显示等功能。     

基于HAZOP法的飞行冲突故障树的建立

针对故障树的建立中所存在的主观性、覆盖性、以及模糊性等问题,提出了一种基于HAZOP法来建立进近和离场期间飞行冲突故障树的方法。通过引导词与航管参数的排列组合确定偏差,然后以偏差事件为节点,分析产生偏差的原因和造成的结果并构建故障树,最后对故障树进行定性定量分析。并以美国两架民航客机在机场上空发生的飞行冲突示例了完整的建模过程。结果表明所建立的故障树在能准确分析飞行冲突成因的基础上,较好地解决传统FTA所存在的局限性。     

United Nations rapid reaction mechanisms: Toward a global force on standby?

This article analyses the main challenges and future prospects of creating United Nations (UN) rapid reaction mechanisms, particularly in the light of past attempts and current discussions about a “UN Vanguard Force” in the wake of the High-Level Panel on Peace Operations report. The article reviews major initiatives (in particular lessons from the Standby High Readiness Brigade for UN Operations) and assesses the main achievements, failures, and challenges related to past UN-led rapid reaction mechanisms. In line with the overall aim of this special forum, the article highlights the future potentials and institutional, operational, financial, and political challenges that need to be overcome in order to design and create a pragmatic and effective rapid reaction tool at the disposal of the UN.     

Scheduling a production–distribution system to optimize the tradeoff between delivery tardiness and distribution cost

We consider a make‐to‐order production–distribution system with one supplier and one or more customers. A set of orders with due dates needs to be processed by the supplier and delivered to the customers upon completion. The supplier can process one order at a time without preemption. Each customer is at a distinct location and only orders from the same customer can be batched together for delivery. Each delivery shipment has a capacity limit and incurs a distribution cost. The problem is to find a joint schedule of order processing at the supplier and order delivery from the supplier to the customers that optimizes an objective function involving the maximum delivery tardiness and the total distribution cost. We first study the solvability of various cases of the problem by either providing an efficient algorithm or proving the intractability of the problem. We then develop a fast heuristic for the general problem. We show that the heuristic is asymptotically optimal as the number of orders goes to infinity. We also evaluate the performance of the heuristic computationally by using lower bounds obtained by a column generation approach. Our results indicate that the heuristic is capable of generating near optimal solutions quickly. Finally, we study the value of production–distribution integration by comparing our integrated approach with two sequential approaches where scheduling decisions for order processing are made first, followed by order delivery decisions, with no or only partial integration of the two decisions. We show that in many cases, the integrated approach performs significantly better than the sequential approaches. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2005